Cookie-indstillinger
Tilpas præferencer

Vi bruger cookies til at hjælpe dig med at navigere effektivt og udføre visse funktioner. Du finder detaljerede oplysninger om alle cookies under hver samtykkekategori nedenfor. Cookies der er kategoriseret som "Nødvendige" er gemt i din browser, da de er essentielle for at aktivere webstedets grundlæggende funktioner. Vi bruger også tredjepartscookies, der hjælper os med at analysere, hvordan du bruger dette websted, gemme dine præferencer og levere indhold der er relevant for dig. Disse cookies vil kun blive gemt i din browser med dit forudgående samtykke. Du kan vælge at aktivere eller deaktivere nogle eller alle af disse cookies, men deaktivering af nogle af dem kan påvirke din browseroplevelse.

Altid aktiv

Nødvendige cookies er essentielle for at få hjemmesiden til at fungere. Denne kategori inkluderer kun cookies som sikrer basale funktioner og sikkerhedsforanstaltninger for denne hjemmeside. Disse cookies gemmer ingen personlige oplysninger.

Funktionelle cookies hjælper med at udføre specifikke funktioner såsom deling af indhold på sociale medier, indsamle feedback og andre tredjeparts funktioner.

Statistik cookies bruges til at forstå hvordan hjemmesidens besøgende interagerer med hjemmesiden. Disse cookie giver informationer om antallet af besøgende, trafikkilder mm.

Marketing cookies bruges til at give den besøgende relevant annoncering og marketing kampagner. Disse cookies tracker besøgende på hjemmesiden og indsamler informationer til at skabe skræddersyet annoncering.

Andre ukategoriserede cookies er ved at blive analyseret og er endnu ikke klassificeret i en kategori.

Evolution of the EU´s and Turkey´s Security Interests, Threat Perceptions and Discourse

Published on

[:en]By Soli Özel (EDAM), Pol Morillas (CIDOB), Jakob Lindgaard (DIIS)

As the relationship between the European Union and Turkey is brought to the spotlight once again, the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) released a paper titled “Evolution of the EU´s and Turkey´s Security Interests, Threat Perceptions and Discourse.” This paper provides a timeline on EU-Turkey relations as well as a debate on whether cooperation or conflict is the likely course of their future. In particular, this paper analyzes the dynamics between Turkey and the EU since World War II, with a specific focus on the Cold War and post-Cold War eras. Furthermore, it explains the reasons for mutual reliance or mistrust, and how this shapes the threat perceptions about each other, which then provide the basis for their decision to cooperate or not in the age of Brexit and the Syrian refugee crisis.

Bosphorus Bridge in Istanbul connecting Europe and Asia

The paper describes this dual relationship as being characterized by “centripetal” and “centrifugal” forces, in other words a push and pull of their incentives to cooperate with each other since WWII. Ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, Turkey has had a pivotal importance given its location and more importantly by the achievement of institutionalizing a form of liberal democracy.  On the other hand, Europe´s internal issues such as the Euro crisis, the refugee crisis and Brexit have created a need to find allies (for which Turkey is an ideal candidate). The authors agree that the biggest hurdle between the EU and Turkey is the Turkey´s Kurdish issue and the perceptions of actions taken from both sides.

In addition, the paper discusses the changing nature of NATO and its main players, particularly the insecurity in relation to the American commitment to NATO under the Trump Administration. Specifically, the relationship between the EU and Turkey is likely to be influenced by “Trump´s lack of commitment to liberal principles and dismissive attitude toward the European Union as a democratic project,” which weakens the whole idea behind the security values built after WWII. The EU has growing concerns over the democracy and oppression of freedoms in Turkey, while Turkey self-perceives itself as a “security provider.” Thus, their diverging security perceptions are of concern and need to be addressed by both parties.

After the so called “successful” refugee deal signed by the EU and Turkey in March 2016, there has been increased interest to work together according to this paper although many areas of disagreement still exist. The paper concludes that convergence is an unlikely prospect in the EU-Turkey relations, yet the many shared concerns are ground for cooperation. Among the factors for cooperation are:

  • Sending the Syrian refugees back as well as lure of participating in the costly rebuilding of Syria
  • Growing jihadi terrorism, as well as cyber security and energy security.

These are the blocs on which the EU and Turkey should build upon for their security and overall relationship in the future.

 

Read more here:

[:da]By Soli Özel (EDAM), Pol Morillas (CIDOB), Jakob Lindgaard (DIIS)

 

As the relationship between the European Union and Turkey is brought to the spotlight once again, the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) released a paper titled “Evolution of the EU´s and Turkey´s Security Interests, Threat Perceptions and Discourse.” This paper provides a timeline on EU-Turkey relations as well as a debate on whether cooperation or conflict is the likely course of their future. In particular, this paper analyzes the dynamics between Turkey and the EU since World War II, with a specific focus on the Cold War and post-Cold War eras. Furthermore, it explains the reasons for mutual reliance or mistrust, and how this shapes the threat perceptions about each other, which then provide the basis for their decision to cooperate or not in the age of Brexit and the Syrian refugee crisis.

Bosphorus Bridge in Istanbul connecting Europe and Asia

The paper describes this dual relationship as being characterized by “centripetal” and “centrifugal” forces, in other words a push and pull of their incentives to cooperate with each other since WWII. Ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, Turkey has had a pivotal importance given its location and more importantly by the achievement of institutionalizing a form of liberal democracy.  On the other hand, Europe´s internal issues such as the Euro crisis, the refugee crisis and Brexit have created a need to find allies (for which Turkey is an ideal candidate). The authors agree that the biggest hurdle between the EU and Turkey is the Turkey´s Kurdish issue and the perceptions of actions taken from both sides.

In addition, the paper discusses the changing nature of NATO and its main players, particularly the insecurity in relation to the American commitment to NATO under the Trump Administration. Specifically, the relationship between the EU and Turkey is likely to be influenced by “Trump´s lack of commitment to liberal principles and dismissive attitude toward the European Union as a democratic project,” which weakens the whole idea behind the security values built after WWII. The EU has growing concerns over the democracy and oppression of freedoms in Turkey, while Turkey self-perceives itself as a “security provider.” Thus, their diverging security perceptions are of concern and need to be addressed by both parties.

After the so called “successful” refugee deal signed by the EU and Turkey in March 2016, there has been increased interest to work together according to this paper although many areas of disagreement still exist. The paper concludes that convergence is an unlikely prospect in the EU-Turkey relations, yet the many shared concerns are ground for cooperation. Among the factors for cooperation are:

  • Sending the Syrian refugees back as well as lure of participating in the costly rebuilding of Syria
  • Growing jihadi terrorism, as well as cyber security and energy security.

These are the blocs on which the EU and Turkey should build upon for their security and overall relationship in the future.

 

Read more here:

[:]

×

Log ind


Glemt adgangskode?

Er du ikke medlem? Opret medlemskab her